Uncivil Procedure

2: Proportionality

Episode Summary

Proportionality is our theme for Episode 2, and Jay Carle of Seyfarth Shaw LLP is our guest. Give a listen as the cast argues with small children, discovers how many laundromats are in Barcelona, and predicts why a self-aware virtual assistant might sue the whole world just 10 short years from now. You might also learn a thing or two about why “you can’t always get what you want” in litigation. Sponsored by JND eDiscovery.

Episode Notes

This month on Uncivil Procedure: The e-Discovery Podcast, Relativity’s David Horrigan, Constantine Pappas, Julie Huner, Danny Pelc, and Anna Siroonian welcome Jay Carle of Seyfarth Shaw LLP to discuss proportionality and semi-related topics such as the merits of arguing with small children and the value of a freezer-burned pint of ice cream.

You can join the conversation by answering these questions:

• When have you been the victim of a disproportionate response to
  something?
• When have you been the perpetrator of a disproportionate
  response?
• What will be 2028’s most disproportionate consideration in a civil
  case?

Looking for case law conversation? The gang covers Hinostroza v. Denny’s, Inc. and historical lawsuits between consumers and corporations.

This episode is brought to you by RelativityOne Certified Partner JND eDiscovery. Follow along with Uncivil Procedure on Twitter, Instagram, The Relativity Blog, or the Relativity Community to keep the conversation going until next month’s episode.